Corporate Communications and Counsel
WE HELP YOU LOOK AND SOUND BETTER

Home  
Who We Are  
What We Do  
What People Say  
In the News  

Recent Releases  
Olivier  
     Inspiritive  
Podcasts  
Corporate Podcasts  
Podcast Classes  
NetCastNow &  NetCastFast!  
Images & Branding 
 
Corporate pages  
Student pages  
 
 
ZENLP 

Contact Us  

Get Your Video on the Web Olivier Group
Inspiritive: Teaching lasting life skills
RMK Voice Productions
NetFM: Australia's first internet radio station
Aware Connections: Australia's #1 Holistic Meeting Place
Elanco: Creating a healthier world
2MBS fine music
Australian Association of Yoga in Daily Life
Buddhist Library and Meditation Centre
Respect Skincare

Animal Health, and Antibiotic Use in Australia


Welcome to this resource centre of material that may help you better understand some of the issues involved in the use of antibiotics in animal production in Australia.

Our view is that the positive impacts far outweigh the negative.

This was confirmed again with a new antibiotic risk assessment of macrolides in the US, published in the Journal of Food Protection (May 3, 2004), a peer reviewed journal.

Key findings from a risk assessment of two macrolide antibiotic compounds, tylosin and tilmicosin, have determined that their use does not adversely affect the safety of the food supply.

"We found that there is an extremely low risk of a person eating beef, poultry, or pork and acquiring a resistant infection that is untreatable with a human macrolide antibiotic," said lead author H. Scott Hurd D.V.M., Ph.D., Hurd-Health Consulting.

The study assessed two bacteria, which are known to have resistance to certain antibiotics, and developed a mathematical equation to determine if using these two macrolide antibiotics could lead to food-borne infections in humans that are difficult to treat. The results of the study, which was conducted by Dr. Hurd and a number of independent medical, food safety, and veterinary experts, show that the risk of acquiring a resistant Campylobacter infection from beef, pork, or poultry that results in a difficult-to-treat food-borne illness is less than one in 10 million. For resistant Enterococci faecium, the chances are even lower – less than one in three billion.

“Given these results, and the fact that human macrolide antibiotics are rarely used to treat people who have food-borne infections, macrolides certainly are among the safest for use in food animal production,” said Ronald N. Jones, M.D., The JONES Group/JMI Labs, North Liberty, IA, who was one of the co-authors of the article.

Read Elanco's Release

This simple comparison of various known risks highlights the safety of these substances.

For the more scientific, this is the Macrolide Risk Assessment Model Methodology.

The human and animal health impact of European Union ban on growth promoting antibiotics discussed in a new Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy article. That information is here.

Dr Ian Lean applauds new Australian research.

A note to journalists
about the use of Dr Ian Lean as a spokesperson.

You can find out more about Ian Lean on his corporate pages.

The full (337 page) report is available here.

The recent release from McDonalds is here.

More on this issue
[an error occurred while processing this directive]     © 2009 Corporate Communications and Counsel. Phone (+612) 9692 0009       Codes of ethics       Your privacy